Re: Aquinas’ Argument from Motion

A reader has asked me to comment on another of Mike D’s posts at The A-Unicornist blog: Aquinas’ Argument from Motion Some day (in the distant future) I’d like to write more on this site about Aquinas’s philosophy but today we shall merely focus on why Mike’s criticisms of the argument from motion are unsuccessful.…

Re: Towards an Understanding of the Mind

A reader solicited comments on two posts from Mike D at The A-Unicornist blog: Toward an Understanding of the Mind: The Mind-Body Problem Toward an Understanding of the Mind: Problems with Dualism The first post just summarizes the mind-body problem. In the second post, Mike states his purpose to be the following: For the purposes…

Could a Neuroscientist Understand a Microprocessor?

Could a Neuroscientist Understand a Microprocessor? by Eric Jonas & Konrad Paul Kording Abstract There is a popular belief in neuroscience that we are primarily data limited, and that producing large, multimodal, and complex datasets will, with the help of advanced data analysis algorithms, lead to fundamental insights into the way the brain processes information.…

Comments on the Principle of Sufficient Reason

Here are some comments I recently made in support of the principle of sufficient reason (PSR). The full discussion can be found here. Somethingness might be the ontological default, and not nothingness. Something could only be the “default state” if there was something that existed necessarily. The universe’s existence is contingent and so we need…