Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics by Daniel J. Castellano Quantum mechanics, to put it gently, is not the most philosophically lucid theory in physics. Its conventional interpretations include fantastic claims that strike at the realist and empiricist underpinnings of modern science. Among these claims are the principle of “superposition,” where an object can be in … Continue reading Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Advertisements

Book Recommendation: Five Proofs of the Existence of God by Edward Feser

Thomist philosopher Edward Feser's Five Proofs of the Existence of God is being added to the recommended readings page. In this book he makes five arguments for God's existence and provides relevant background knowledge as he works through the proofs. He also argues that we can know some of the attributes of God. Objections to … Continue reading Book Recommendation: Five Proofs of the Existence of God by Edward Feser

Re: Naturalism and the Fundamental Question

I was asked to comment on Stephen Maitzen's article Naturalism and the Fundamental Question. The fundamental question (FQ) is: why is there anything, rather than nothing at all? The first problem I have with the article is that Maitzen defines the "natural" as "the denial of supernaturalism: the denial that any nonnatural minds, agents, or … Continue reading Re: Naturalism and the Fundamental Question

The cheap grace of condemning slavery

The cheap grace of condemning slavery There is a long history of arguing that, in fact, no one can be entitled to our labor, and that to sell our labor is as morally wrong as slavery. I suspect this goes too far, and that the closest we can get to a short definition of slavery is labor without … Continue reading The cheap grace of condemning slavery

Re: Aquinas’ Argument from Motion

A reader has asked me to comment on another of Mike D's posts at The A-Unicornist blog: Aquinas' Argument from Motion Some day (in the distant future) I'd like to write more on this site about Aquinas's philosophy but today we shall merely focus on why Mike's criticisms of the argument from motion are unsuccessful. … Continue reading Re: Aquinas’ Argument from Motion

Re: Towards an Understanding of the Mind

A reader solicited comments on two posts from Mike D at The A-Unicornist blog: Toward an Understanding of the Mind: The Mind-Body Problem Toward an Understanding of the Mind: Problems with Dualism The first post just summarizes the mind-body problem. In the second post, Mike states his purpose to be the following: For the purposes … Continue reading Re: Towards an Understanding of the Mind

Could a Neuroscientist Understand a Microprocessor?

Could a Neuroscientist Understand a Microprocessor? by Eric Jonas & Konrad Paul Kording Abstract There is a popular belief in neuroscience that we are primarily data limited, and that producing large, multimodal, and complex datasets will, with the help of advanced data analysis algorithms, lead to fundamental insights into the way the brain processes information. … Continue reading Could a Neuroscientist Understand a Microprocessor?